Does the Physical Act of Placing a Bet Matter? App vs Desktop vs In-Person

yeah fade it basically is for me... therapist explained the dopamine stuff... phone makes it worse because i can get that hit anytime anywhere...
 
MadMarket
Conor you doing alright mate?
 
yeah im okay... just accepted this is part of my life now... trying to manage it better... some weeks good some weeks bad...
 
Back to original question: interface matters significantly.

Cash/in-person: highest friction, best for discipline.
Desktop: medium friction, allows research integration.
Mobile: zero friction, dangerous for impulsive bettors.
 
Agree with that hierarchy.

I'd add: if you struggle with discipline, avoid mobile betting entirely.
 
Correct recommendation.

Mobile betting optimized for convenience and volume, not decision quality.
 
What about voice betting?

Like Amazon Alexa or whatever.

That's even weirder innit.
 
Voice betting is the logical extreme of frictionless betting.

Thought immediately becomes action without even physical touch.
 
Voice betting most dangerous interface possible.

No visual confirmation, no tactile interaction, no cognitive checkpoint.

Pure impulse to action conversion.
 
lads if voice betting becomes standard im completely f**ked... already cant control phone betting... voice would destroy me...
 
Yeah that seems properly dangerous.

At least with phone you have to look at the screen and tap.

Voice is just... speaking your bad decisions into existence.
 
Regulatory concern. Voice betting should require additional safeguards.

Delay between command and execution minimum.
 
Princess that's exactly the problem. "Convenience" in betting usually means danger.
 

Similar threads

Betting Forum
Guide Does Time of Possession Matter in NFL Betting?
Replies
0
Views
74
Betting Forum
Betting Forum
Back
Top
Odds