Do You Trust Other Bettors?

FadeThePublic

Market Sharp
Joined
Sep 7, 2024
Messages
493
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Not tips. That's a different question.

I mean genuine trust. The kind where you'd tell someone something true about your situation and believe they'd handle it honestly.

The kind where you'd take their assessment of your betting at face value rather than filtering it for self-interest.

I've been in betting communities for fifteen years. Online forums. Local groups. The serious end of social media.

I can count on one hand the bettors I'd call genuinely trustworthy in any meaningful sense.

Not because they're bad people. Because the activity structurally undermines trust.

We're all trying to beat the same market. We all have methodologies we protect. We all perform confidence we don't always feel. We're all, to some degree, managing impressions.

That's the environment. You can't fully trust people inside it the way you trust people outside it.

Or can you. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this community is different from my experience.
 
Not with tips. That's been my position for years and it hasn't changed.

Anyone sharing tips freely has one of three things going on. They're wrong about the edge. They want the line movement. Or they want something from you they haven't named yet.

Personal trust is a different question and I'd separate it into two things.

Process trust: do I trust another bettor's reasoning about their own approach. Sometimes yes. Some people in this forum I trust completely to analyze their own situation honestly.

Outcome trust: do I trust that what they're telling me about their results is accurate. Almost never. Not because of deliberate dishonesty. Because we all have the win exaggeration problem we discussed. Nobody tells the fully accurate version of their record.

So: sometimes yes on process, almost never on outcome.
 
The lads in the pub. Blokes I've bet alongside for years.

I trust them in the way you trust people you've spent a lot of time with.

But it's a specific kind of trust. I trust them to commiserate genuinely. To celebrate genuinely. To cover for me if Bronwyn asks what we were talking about.

I don't trust their tips. I don't trust their records. I don't tell them the real number.

It's a trust built around the shared activity but not extending very far into the actual substance of it.

Might be the same as what Fade's describing.

We trust each other to maintain the social fiction around the betting. Not to be honest about what the betting actually is.
 
My group chat girls. I trust them completely in the normal friend sense.

But reading this thread I'm realising I've never told any of them my actual lifetime losses.

I told my sister. I told this forum. I haven't told the people I watch games with every week.

So I trust them with everything except the specific information that would change what they think about my betting.

Which might mean I trust them with everything except the thing that matters here.
 
The coaching networks I mentioned in the stranger conversation thread. Other coaches who bet. There's a specific shorthand. A recognition.

That recognition produces something that feels like trust quickly.

But I've noticed it's trust within limits neither person has defined.

We share enough to feel connected. Not enough to actually know each other's situation.

The shared vice creates intimacy faster than it should. The intimacy doesn't go as deep as it feels.

The coach I sat with at the convention. Felt genuine in that room. I'd be surprised if he'd recognise me at the next one.
 
Do not trust other bettors with methodology.

The Bundesliga model took years to develop. It produces consistent results. I share the fact of it but not the contents.

This is not paranoia. The model's value is partly in its distinctiveness. Sharing it widely would alter the markets it applies to.

Trust in the information sense is incompatible with serious betting. The information is the edge. The edge is the product.

Sharing it is not generosity. It is self-destruction.

Personal trust is a different question.

In this forum: some. Selectively. Based on observed honesty over time.

Conor I trust completely because the honesty has been consistent and demonstrably costly.

Klaus trusts the people who have shown they can tell themselves true things. Most bettors cannot.
 
Back
Top
GOALLLL!
Odds