Would You Rather Your Partner Know Your Full Search History or Full Betting History?

[FadeThePublic]

Hypothetical that's been living rent free in my head:

You have to choose. Your partner sees EVERYTHING from one of these:

Option A - Full search history. Every weird rabbit hole, every embarrassing Google at 2am, every symptom you looked up and convinced yourself was cancer.

Option B - Full betting history. Every bet, every amount, every time you said you'd stop and didn't, every loss you never mentioned.

Which do you hand over?

I've thought about this more than I should and I genuinely don't know my answer. Search history is embarrassing. Betting history is incriminating.

 

[TaffyTipster]

Betting history no question.
Search history is weird but harmless innit.
"Why is my left knee clicking" and "best kebab Cardiff" and whatever else.
Betting history shows the actual problem.
The amounts.
The frequency.
The lies by omission.
Give her the search history every time.

 

[ParlayPrincess_88]

Search history for sure!
My betting history would be SO depressing to show someone after that thread where I calculated my losses lol
My search history is just like... celebrity gossip and "is this rash normal" stuff
Way less damaging!

 

[SharpEddie47]

Interesting question because the answer reveals what you think is more shameful.

I'd give search history. My betting history is meticulous - every bet logged, every unit size, every result. Handed to my wife it would look fine on the surface. Profitable, disciplined, organized.

But it would also show how many hours I spend on it. How many Sunday mornings are blocked out. How the bankroll adjustments correspond exactly to periods she thought I was "just watching games."

The search history has nothing that revealing. Betting history has the full pattern.

 

[oli_sussex]

No partner so question doesn't apply directly.
But hypothetically - betting history.
Search history contains nothing embarrassing. Betting analysis, statistical models, odds comparison.
Betting history would reveal time investment I've never disclosed to anyone.

 

[Klaus]

Betting history contains quantifiable evidence of priority misallocation.
Search history contains nothing that cannot be explained.

Would choose to show search history.
Betting history reveals exactly how many hours I spend on this when I have told my wife it is "occasional."
The data would be devastating.

 

[CoachTony_Bets]

Search history. Without question.

My betting history shows that I bet on games my own players are involved in. Not fixing anything, just having action. But try explaining that to someone outside the world.

Also the sheer volume would be impossible to justify. My wife thinks I bet "a few times a week." The history would show daily activity going back years.

Search history? Fine. Some weird late night Wikipedia spirals. Nothing that changes how she sees me.

 

[DublinDegen]

betting history would destroy me... literally destroy me... not just relationship wise but the whole thing laid out in one place... every session every loss every time i said i stopped and didnt... emma never knew the real numbers... if she had seen it she wouldve left way sooner than she did... she did leave eventually but at least she didnt see the spreadsheet...

search history is just sad internet stuff... nothing that ruins a relationship...

give them the search history every time...

 

[TaffyTipster]

Conor mentioning Emma again.
You doing alright mate?