Calibration is a simple idea that very few bettors measure.
If you assign a probability of 70% to a set of outcomes, roughly 70% of them should occur. Not every time. Over enough instances. If your 70s hit 58% of the time, the estimates are overconfident, whatever your overall win rate says.
I record a probability for every selection. After fourteen years I have 2,140 qualifying bets in the database, and I have only recently done the exercise properly: sorted them by stated probability, grouped them into bins, and compared stated with observed.
The result was uncomfortable. I will share it, but first I would like to know how many of you record a probability at all.
When you say 70%, what actually happens?
If you assign a probability of 70% to a set of outcomes, roughly 70% of them should occur. Not every time. Over enough instances. If your 70s hit 58% of the time, the estimates are overconfident, whatever your overall win rate says.
I record a probability for every selection. After fourteen years I have 2,140 qualifying bets in the database, and I have only recently done the exercise properly: sorted them by stated probability, grouped them into bins, and compared stated with observed.
The result was uncomfortable. I will share it, but first I would like to know how many of you record a probability at all.
When you say 70%, what actually happens?