- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,576
- Reaction score
- 184
- Points
- 63
This guide is for players who think they've got blackjack figured out and are confused why they're still losing money, or anyone who wants honest information about what blackjack actually offers instead of the romanticized version sold by movies and gambling books.
Basic Strategy Only Gets You Close to Even
Perfect basic strategy - playing every hand mathematically optimally based on your cards and the dealer's upcard - reduces the house edge to somewhere around 0.5% in typical games. That's way better than slots or roulette, but it's still negative expectation. Over time, you're losing half a percent of everything you bet.
That doesn't sound like much until you run the numbers. Bet £25 per hand, play 60 hands per hour, that's £1,500 wagered per hour. At 0.5% house edge you're losing £7.50 per hour on average. Play ten hours and you've lost £75. That's with perfect basic strategy. Most players don't play perfectly, so their losses are higher.
People hear "0.5% house edge" and think that means they'll almost break even. What it actually means is the casino is slowly grinding you down, just slower than other games. You'll have sessions where you win because of variance, but over hundreds or thousands of hands you're losing money at a predictable rate.
The other problem is most casinos don't offer games with 0.5% house edge anymore. They've adjusted rules to increase the edge. Six-deck shoes, dealer hits soft 17, blackjack pays 6:5 instead of 3:2, no doubling after splits. These rule changes can push house edge above 1% or even 2%. At that point you're not playing a "good" game anymore, you're just losing slower than slots.
Card Counting Is Hard and Mostly Doesn't Work Anymore
Card counting works in theory. Keep track of high cards versus low cards remaining in the shoe, bet more when the count is favorable, bet less when it's not. Over long periods this can create a small player edge, maybe 1-2% if conditions are perfect and you play perfectly.
But conditions are never perfect. Casinos use six or eight deck shoes and cut off the last 1-2 decks, which reduces penetration and limits how strong the count can get. They shuffle more frequently. They watch for bet spreads and betting patterns that indicate counting. If they think you're counting, they'll ask you to leave or shuffle after every hand, which destroys any edge.
Even if you can count without getting caught, the edge is small and the variance is massive. You might have 2% edge when counting perfectly, but you still need huge bankroll to survive the swings. You can play with an edge and still lose thousands over a weekend because variance worked against you. The edge only shows up over tens of thousands of hands.
And most people who think they're counting are doing it wrong. They learned a system online or from a book, they're making mistakes in execution, they're not adjusting for rule variations, they're not betting correctly for the count. They think they're playing with an edge but they're actually still playing at a disadvantage because their counting isn't accurate enough.
Casinos Neutralized Card Counting Decades Ago
Casinos figured out how to stop card counting without banning it outright. Use more decks, cut cards deeper, shuffle more often, spread to multiple tables to dilute counting effectiveness. The games available today in most casinos are designed to make card counting unprofitable.
You can still technically count cards. You won't get arrested, it's not illegal. But you probably won't make money because the game conditions don't allow for sufficient edge. And if you do start winning consistently, the casino will identify you and make your life difficult until you leave or stop winning.
Professional card counting teams still exist but they're using sophisticated techniques, large bankrolls, team play, and they're constantly moving between casinos to avoid detection. If you're a solo player learning to count from YouTube, you're not competing at that level. You're likely just making counting errors while playing a game designed to neutralize counting anyway.
Variance Destroys Your Bankroll Before Edge Matters
Even if you're playing with perfect basic strategy or a small counting edge, variance can wreck you in the short term. Blackjack has high variance. You can play perfectly and lose 15 hands in a row. Dealer keeps drawing 21s, you keep busting on 16s, splits and doubles go wrong. Nothing you did was incorrect, but variance clustered losses together and your bankroll is gone.
This is especially brutal for players with small bankrolls. You've got £300, you're betting £10-15 per hand, you hit a bad run of 20 hands and suddenly you're down £200. You're playing perfectly but the cards didn't cooperate. Now you're stuck deciding whether to quit down badly or increase bets trying to recover, which usually just accelerates losses.
Professional players handle variance by having massive bankrolls relative to their bet size. If you're betting £25 per hand, you might need £10,000+ bankroll to safely handle variance. Most casual players don't have that. They have £500, maybe £1000, which isn't enough to survive the inevitable losing streaks even when playing perfectly.
The short-term results are basically random even with perfect play. Over 50 hands, anything can happen. Over 500 hands, you're probably close to expectation but still might be significantly up or down. Over 5,000 hands you'll converge toward expected value, but most casual players never reach that sample size in their lifetime of playing.
You Probably Don't Know Basic Strategy as Well as You Think
Basic strategy isn't intuitive. It requires memorizing correct plays for every possible combination of your hand and dealer upcard. Most players learn the common situations and then guess or use intuition for the less common ones. Those errors add up.
Splitting 8s against a dealer 10. Doubling 11 against a dealer ace. Hitting 12 against dealer 2 or 3. These are correct basic strategy plays that feel wrong. Most players make errors on these situations because they're afraid of busting or they "feel" like standing is safer. Each error costs money over time.
Even small deviations from perfect basic strategy increase house edge. If you're playing at 1% disadvantage instead of 0.5% because of strategy errors, you're losing twice as much money per hour as you think you are. Over ten hours that's the difference between losing £75 and losing £150.
The other problem is basic strategy changes based on game rules. The correct play for a hand changes depending on whether dealer hits or stands on soft 17, how many decks are in play, whether you can double after splitting. Most players learn one basic strategy chart and apply it to every game, which means they're making errors whenever rules differ from what they memorized.
Common Mistakes People Don't Realize Are Mistakes
Standing on 16 against dealer 7 because you're afraid to bust. That's a mistake. You should hit. The dealer having 7 means they're likely to make 17 or better, and your 16 loses to all of those. Hitting is the better play even though you'll bust over half the time.
Taking insurance when you have blackjack. Players think they're "protecting" their blackjack. Actually, insurance is a side bet on whether the dealer has 10 underneath, and it's a bad bet unless you're counting cards and know the deck is rich in 10s. Taking insurance on your blackjack turns a 3:2 payout into an even money payout, which costs you money over time.
Never splitting 10s. This is actually correct basic strategy most of the time, but players feel proud of themselves for "correctly" never splitting 10s, then they make errors on actually difficult decisions. Knowing the easy rules doesn't mean you know basic strategy.
Side Bets Are Money Incinerators
Most blackjack tables offer side bets - 21+3, Perfect Pairs, Lucky Ladies, various bonus bets based on your first cards or whether you'll get certain combinations. These side bets have massive house edges, often 3-7% or higher. They're designed to look exciting and pay big when they hit, but they're terrible value.
Players convince themselves side bets are "just for fun" or "worth it for the excitement." But every pound you put on side bets is expected to lose much more than your main blackjack bet. If you're betting £10 on the main hand and £2 on Perfect Pairs every hand, that £2 side bet is losing money far faster than the main bet even if you're playing perfect basic strategy.
The math is brutal. A side bet with 5% house edge betting £2 per hand costs you £0.10 per hand in expectation. Over 60 hands per hour that's £6 per hour just from the side bet. Add that to the £7.50 per hour you're losing from the main game with perfect basic strategy, and now you're losing £13.50 per hour instead of £7.50. The side bet doubled your losses.
Side bets also increase variance dramatically. They pay big when they hit - maybe 25:1 or 100:1 or higher - which means you'll occasionally have a session where you win because the side bet hit a few times. This reinforces the behavior even though long-term you're hemorrhaging money. The occasional big side bet win doesn't come close to making up for all the losses.
The House Edge Compounds Over Time
A 0.5% house edge sounds small. The problem is it applies to every bet you make, and those losses compound. You start with £500. After 100 hands betting £10 each, you're expected to lose £5 (0.5% of £1,000 wagered). Now you have £495. Next 100 hands, you lose another £5. Then another. After 1,000 hands you've lost £50, after 5,000 hands you've lost £250.
People think "I'm only losing 0.5% so if I play carefully I'll stay close to even." That's not how it works. The edge grinds you down continuously. Unless you're adding fresh money to your bankroll, your balance is slowly eroding every session. Even sessions where you win, you're usually not winning enough to make up for all the previous losing sessions.
The casino doesn't need a big edge when they have time on their side. They're happy to slowly grind away your bankroll over months and years. Most players eventually lose everything they've ever put into blackjack because the house edge is relentless and never stops applying.
This is why casinos offer free drinks and comfortable chairs and good atmosphere. They want you to stay and play longer because the longer you play, the more certain it is that the house edge catches up to you. Short sessions can go either way because of variance. Long-term play always converges toward the expected value, which is you losing money.
Online Blackjack Is Usually Worse
Online blackjack often has worse rules than live casino blackjack. Blackjack pays 6:5 instead of 3:2. Dealer hits soft 17. Limited doubling and splitting options. These rule changes increase the house edge sometimes to 2% or more. You're playing a much worse game than you'd find at a decent live casino.
Online blackjack also plays much faster. Live blackjack might be 60 hands per hour. Online can be 150-200 hands per hour because there's no dealing delay, no other players, no shuffling. That faster pace means you're exposing yourself to house edge more frequently, which increases your losses per hour even if the edge is the same.
Some online casinos offer live dealer blackjack which has better rules and slower pace. That's closer to real casino experience. But even then you're often playing at tables with rule variations that increase house edge compared to optimal games. And you can't card count online because the shoe gets shuffled too frequently or the penetration is terrible.
The main advantage of online blackjack is you can play at lower stakes. If you want to practice basic strategy at £1 per hand, online lets you do that. But you're not going to beat online blackjack. The rules are designed to ensure the house edge is strong enough that even perfect play keeps you losing over time.
RNG Blackjack Is Even Worse
Non-live dealer online blackjack uses RNG to determine cards. These games shuffle after every hand, which completely eliminates any possibility of card counting or streak detection. Every hand is independent with fresh deck odds.
The rules on RNG blackjack are often terrible. Combined with the inability to count and the extremely fast pace of play, RNG blackjack has some of the worst player value of any casino game. You're better off playing live dealer if you're going to play online, or just playing something else entirely.
Some RNG blackjack games have house edges above 2%, which is worse than some slot machines. At that point you're not playing "the best odds in the casino," you're playing a house-edge money extraction device that happens to be themed as blackjack.
Most Players Tilt and Make Emotional Decisions
Even players who know basic strategy make errors when they're losing. They start chasing losses, betting more than they should, making aggressive plays hoping to recover quickly. They deviate from basic strategy because they're frustrated or desperate. All of this increases the house edge beyond what it would be with perfect calm play.
Blackjack feels personal in a way slots don't. When the dealer draws 21 three times in a row, it feels targeted even though it's random. When you bust on 16 against dealer 7, you feel like you made a mistake even though you played correctly. These emotional responses lead to bad decisions.
I've watched players at tables who clearly know basic strategy, they're playing correctly for 30 minutes, then they have a bad run of ten hands and suddenly they're making emotional decisions. Not splitting 8s because they're "not feeling it." Taking insurance because they "can't afford another loss." Increasing bets way beyond their bankroll because they're trying to recover.
The casino doesn't need to cheat when players destroy themselves emotionally. The house edge already guarantees profit, but emotional play accelerates it. Most players who lose significant money at blackjack didn't lose it purely to house edge - they lost it to tilt decisions made after variance turned against them.
Winning Streaks Are Temporary and Misleading
You have a great session, win £400 in two hours. You think you've figured out blackjack or you're "running hot" or you're playing better than usual. Actually, you just got lucky. Variance gave you a winning session. The house edge is still there, it'll reassert itself eventually.
Winning streaks make players overconfident. They start thinking they can beat blackjack long-term, they start betting bigger, they stop being careful with bankroll management. Then variance turns and they lose back everything they won plus more, but now they're stuck chasing because they remember the winning session and think they can recreate it.
The worst thing that can happen to a blackjack player is winning big early. It creates false confidence and establishes expectations that can't be maintained. Better to lose small early so you learn that blackjack is a slow grind against house edge, not a game where big wins are sustainable.
Casinos love players who have big winning sessions because those players usually give it all back and more. The win creates emotional attachment and confidence, which leads to more play, which leads to house edge eventually claiming all the profits plus additional losses.
FAQ
Can anyone beat blackjack long-term with card counting?
Technically possible but extremely difficult in modern casino conditions. You need perfect counting, perfect betting strategy, massive bankroll to handle variance, and you need to avoid casino detection. Most people who think they're counting profitably are actually losing money because they're making errors or playing games with conditions that neutralize counting edges.
Is blackjack still the best odds game in the casino?
With perfect basic strategy and good rules, yes. But most players don't play perfectly and most games don't have good rules anymore. In practice, the gap between blackjack and other games has narrowed because of rule changes and player errors. You're still probably losing less per hour at blackjack than slots, but it's not the huge difference it used to be.
Should I just not play blackjack then?
If you enjoy it and understand you're paying for entertainment, play blackjack. Just don't lie to yourself that you're beating it or that you're going to be profitable long-term. Set loss limits, play within your budget, treat it as entertainment cost like any other casino game. The problem is players who think blackjack is "beatable" and chase losses trying to prove it.
Last edited: