SharpEddie47
Market Sharp
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2024
- Messages
- 581
- Reaction score
- 16
- Points
- 18
Caught myself doing something last week that I'm not proud of.
Mentioned a win to a guy I know casually. Another bettor. We talk occasionally.
The win was real. $340 on a Cowboys divisional game. Solid return. Legitimate edge identified, process executed correctly.
By the time I finished telling him about it the stake had grown, the odds had lengthened, and my pre-game analysis had become something approaching prophetic.
None of the inflation was dramatic enough to call a lie exactly. More like... selective emphasis. The details arranged to produce maximum impression.
He wasn't there. He couldn't check. And I wanted him to think something specific about me.
I've been tracking my bets honestly for twenty years. I apparently cannot report them honestly in casual conversation.
Why isn't the win enough without the performance around it? And has anyone else caught themselves doing this?
Mentioned a win to a guy I know casually. Another bettor. We talk occasionally.
The win was real. $340 on a Cowboys divisional game. Solid return. Legitimate edge identified, process executed correctly.
By the time I finished telling him about it the stake had grown, the odds had lengthened, and my pre-game analysis had become something approaching prophetic.
None of the inflation was dramatic enough to call a lie exactly. More like... selective emphasis. The details arranged to produce maximum impression.
He wasn't there. He couldn't check. And I wanted him to think something specific about me.
I've been tracking my bets honestly for twenty years. I apparently cannot report them honestly in casual conversation.
Why isn't the win enough without the performance around it? And has anyone else caught themselves doing this?