Betting at Inappropriate Moments - When You Knew You Shouldn't but Did Anyway

CoachTony_Bets

Market Sharp
Joined
Dec 7, 2024
Messages
619
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Klaus mentioned it in the smallest bet thread and it's stayed with me.

The one euro bet placed during his daughter's school play specifically so the app would send score notifications.

Not as judgment. As recognition.

I've done versions of this. Every person in this forum probably has.

The specific quality of the inappropriate betting moment that distinguishes it from regular betting: you know in advance it's wrong. Not afterward. Before. The wrongness is visible to you while you're doing it.

The wedding reception I attended two years ago. A friend's wedding. Open bar, beautiful venue, people I genuinely care about.

Michigan had a significant game that afternoon. I'd placed a pre-game bet but the game ran into the reception.

Checked the score four times during the speeches. Bathroom trip at halftime. The genuinely important life event happening around me while I maintained a monitoring relationship with a football game via my phone.

The clarity of knowing this was wrong while doing it is the specific thing I want to examine.

Not the addiction narrative. Not the crisis. Just the specific ordinary moment when you were somewhere that deserved your full attention and gave it partial attention because something was live.
 
Bronwyn's sister's fortieth birthday.

I had Wales in a World Cup qualifier that afternoon.

The party was in the evening. The game finished before we left. Should have been fine.

But there was a second game that mattered for the qualifying table. It kicked off while we were at the party.

Spent two hours checking my phone at a party full of people who'd notice and judge me for it.

Bronwyn noticed within twenty minutes.

Said nothing until we were in the car going home.

Then said: "You were somewhere else tonight."

Not angry. Tired.

The someone else comment from the smallest bet thread. The being elsewhere from the seasonal rhythm thread.

Both from the same person. Both noticed before I'd even acknowledged it to myself.
 
my grandmother's funeral...

sitting in the church during the service...

had a bet running on a lunchtime match...

knew the score was updating...

waited until they stood for a hymn to check my phone...

won the bet...

felt the win register while my grandmother's funeral was happening around me...

didn't feel good about it...

didn't feel anything about it properly until later when the inappropriateness of the checking landed...

that one stays with me...

not because it was the most money or the worst period...

because of the specific clarity of what i was doing and where i was while i was doing it...
 
The client call during my Super Bowl model described in the best bet thread.

That was the wrong direction. The call interrupted the bet.

The flip side exists in my record too.

Client meeting. Significant client. First hour had my full attention.

Second hour: NFL divisional playoff game was live. I'd placed a significant bet.

The client was still talking. I was still responding. The conversation was still professional.

But a portion of my processing was elsewhere. Monitoring the game in a mental background thread while appearing present.

The client didn't know.

I knew.

The quality of attention the second hour deserved wasn't what it got.

The quality of attention the game received while I was in the meeting wasn't what it needed either.

Two things simultaneously, neither getting full presence.

The bet didn't make the meeting worse in any visible way.

The meeting made my relationship with the live bet worse in a way that's hard to quantify.

Splitting attention isn't the same as giving full attention to two things. It's giving partial attention to both.
 
My best friend's bachelorette weekend.

We were in Nashville. Two nights.

I had an NFL parlay running across Sunday.

The Sunday of a bachelorette weekend is supposed to be recovery brunch and everyone together before heading home.

I was physically there. At brunch. Present in conversation.

Also checking my parlay between every piece of conversation.

Nobody knew. The phone checking was casual enough to look normal in 2023.

The parlay hit. I didn't tell anyone because explaining would mean explaining what I'd been doing during brunch.

The parlay money exists. The brunch memory is incomplete because part of my attention was somewhere else for it.

Whether anyone there noticed: probably not.

Whether I got the full version of my best friend's bachelorette weekend: definitely not.
 
The "nobody noticed" rationalization is the one I've used most frequently.

The meeting that continued professionally. The wedding reception where the score checks were discreet. The family dinner where the phone was under the table but not visible.

The absence of external consequence as the definition of acceptable behavior.

Nobody noticed: therefore it was fine.

The person who noticed: you. Before, during, and after.

The self-awareness that the moment was wrong didn't prevent the behavior. It just added a layer of guilt to the experience of the behavior.

Which is probably worse than not knowing it was wrong.
 
The inappropriate moments that I regret most are the ones with Margaret.

Not the dramatic ones. The accumulated small ones.

The evening she wanted to watch something together and a match I had money on was running simultaneously.

The arrangement I made with her where I would watch the first half of her program and then "check on something" for the second half.

The "checking on something" that was actually switching screens.

The negotiated presence that was still an absence.

She knew. She accommodated it more than she challenged it.

The accommodation was its own form of signal that I processed as permission.

The times she said nothing when she could have said something: they weren't acceptance. They were resignation.

I understood this at the time in a way that didn't produce change.

The understanding without the change is the recurring theme that this forum keeps finding.
 
Prof's "accommodation as resignation."

Bronwyn has done this too.

The specific version where the absence of complaint becomes the justification for continuation.

She doesn't say anything therefore it's acceptable.

The not saying anything requires energy from her that I'm not accounting for.

The management of disappointment is work she's doing that I'm not seeing.
 
The invisible work of managing around it.

The partner who rearranges expectations to accommodate the monitoring.

Who stops planning evenings around things that might coincide with games.

Who learns which topics of conversation will get full attention and which will get half.

The adaptation that happens silently and that I've interpreted as the arrangement working.

It's the arrangement working for me.

For them it's the arrangement they've resigned themselves to.
 
Back
Top
GOALLLL!
Odds