A winning result should not automatically receive a high grade. I would score process and result separately: whether the information was checked, whether the price was reasonable, whether the stake followed the plan, and only then note the outcome. A poor decision that happens to win is still...
A journal seems most useful when it records the decision before the outcome is known. Writing the market, price, stake, reason and conditions that would invalidate the bet makes the later review less vulnerable to hindsight. The result still matters, but the quality of the original decision can...
Hi everyone. I’m interested in practical gambling research, especially payment clarity, KYC preparation and responsible limits. I’m here to learn from forum discussions and share structured checklists when they are useful.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.