- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,564
- Reaction score
- 184
- Points
- 63
This guide is for bettors who know green speed matters but aren't sure how to factor it into their selections or when it's worth paying attention to versus when it's just noise.
Most courses run greens around 10-11 on the stimpmeter during regular PGA Tour events. Augusta runs 13-14 during Masters week. US Open venues push 14 or higher. That difference completely changes which players can contend and which players will four-putt from 30 feet. The market prices in that it's a major championship but often misses which specific players struggle or thrive when greens get lightning fast.
What Green Speed Actually Does
Faster greens amplify every mistake. On a green running 10, you can be slightly aggressive with your speed and probably stay close to the hole. On a green running 13.5, that same aggression sends you six feet past and now you're putting back up a slope with break.Touch becomes everything. Players with good speed control separate from players who rely on reading break well. You can read the perfect line but if your speed is off by five percent on a fast green, you're missing by three feet instead of six inches.
Slope matters more as greens get faster. A subtle two-percent slope that's manageable at 10 on the stimp becomes treacherous at 13. Putts that would hold their line on slower greens start sliding sideways. Downhill putts become almost impossible to stop near the hole.
Lag putting separates the field more than usual. Everyone on tour can make putts inside eight feet on any surface. But from 30-50 feet on lightning-fast greens, some players consistently leave themselves tap-ins while others spray it four feet past or come up six feet short. That gap in three-putt avoidance becomes massive over 72 holes.
Green speed also affects approach shots more than people realize. When you know the greens are running 13+, you can't just fire at pins. You need to think about where a miss leaves you. Landing area and spin control become more important. Players who are just okay at controlling trajectory and spin struggle to get the ball close because aggressive play gets punished.
Which Players Handle Fast Greens
Check their putting stats on fast surfaces specifically. DataGolf and other sites break down putting performance by green speed. Some players putt significantly better on slower greens. Others are flat or better on fast greens. This isn't about feel or nerves, it's about technical putting strokes that work better on certain surfaces.Players with shorter, more controlled putting strokes tend to handle fast greens better. Long flowing strokes work great on slower greens where you need to generate pace, but on fast greens they're harder to control. You see this at Augusta constantly - players with compact strokes contend while players with big flowing strokes struggle.
Lag putting stats matter more than make percentage. Three-putt avoidance and performance from 25+ feet tells you more about how someone will score on fast greens than their overall putting average. Anyone can make six-footers. Not everyone can consistently lag 40-footers to tap-in range on downhill slopes.
Experience on fast greens is genuinely useful here, more than most course history factors. Players who've competed at Augusta, US Opens, and major championships have faced these conditions before. They know what 13.5 feels like and how to adjust. First-timers often struggle because the adjustment isn't intuitive.
Also check how aggressive they are with approach shots. Conservative players who aim for fat parts of greens have an edge when greens are fast because they're not dealing with as many treacherous downhill putts or putts from above the hole. Players who fire at every pin rack up three-putts quickly when the greens are running hot.
Tournaments Where Green Speed Changes Everything
The Masters is the obvious one. Augusta's greens are famously fast and the slopes are severe. Players who can't lag putt get destroyed. You see contenders make the turn at -4 and then three-putt their way to +1 on the back nine. That doesn't happen on normal tour stops.US Open setups push green speeds as high as they can go while keeping the greens playable. Combine that with US Open hole locations that are already brutal and you get torture tests where half the field can't break 75. Players who've contended at multiple US Opens have proven they can handle it. First-timers often implode.
The Players Championship at TPC Sawgrass runs greens faster than most regular tour stops, usually around 12-12.5. The greens also have severe slopes and crowned surfaces. Three-putts spike compared to other Florida events. Players who putt well at The Players tend to be excellent lag putters who don't get aggressive.
Certain venues just have naturally fast greens even during regular events. Colonial, Harbour Town, and Hilton Head run greens quicker than average. If you're betting those tournaments, green speed becomes more relevant even though they're not majors.
Weather affects this too. Greens get faster when they dry out. If a course got rain earlier in the week but it's forecasted to be sunny and windy for the weekend, greens will firm up and speed up significantly. That changes which players have an edge as conditions shift.
When Green Speed Doesn't Matter Much
Most regular PGA Tour stops run greens at similar speeds - somewhere in the 10-11 range. The difference between 10.5 and 11 isn't enough to create meaningful edges. Everyone can handle that. You're not finding bets based on green speed at the Waste Management Open or The American Express.Courses with minimal slope don't test lag putting even when greens are fast. If greens are flat and fast, it's actually easier to control speed than if they're slower with big slopes. Some desert courses in the California swing have pretty quick greens but they're so flat it doesn't matter.
When weather is making conditions unpredictable. If it's raining intermittently and greens are going from firm to soft throughout the day, whatever green speed advantage a player might normally have gets neutralized. Conditions are too variable to bank on.
Early season events when players haven't settled into form yet. Green speed edges matter more when everyone's playing their A-game and small differences separate players. In February when half the field is still shaking off rust, form and course fit matter way more than putting nuances.
The Trap Everyone Falls Into
People see that greens are running fast and immediately back the best putter in the field by overall stats. That's wrong because overall putting stats include tons of rounds on slower greens. You need to look at performance specifically on fast greens.Someone might rank 5th on tour in strokes gained putting overall but only 40th on fast greens. Another player might rank 25th overall but 8th on fast greens. When you're betting a tournament with 13+ stimp, the second player is the better bet if everything else is equal.
The other mistake is assuming fast greens = conservative play wins. Sometimes that's true, especially at US Opens where the goal is survival. But at Augusta, you still need to make birdies. It's not about playing safe, it's about having the lag putting skills to avoid three-putts while still being aggressive enough to score.
Also people forget that green speed affects different parts of the course differently. Bentgrass and poa annua respond to speed differently. Greens with severe slope become disproportionately harder when fast. Not all fast greens create the same test.
The Augusta Effect
Augusta is its own category. The greens are fast enough that lag putting becomes the most important skill in golf that week. You can scramble and hit it all over the property and still contend if you don't three-putt. But if you're three-putting twice per round, you have no chance.Check putting performance at Augusta specifically for past participants. Some players just cannot handle those greens. Others figure it out after a couple attempts. Jordan Spieth's putting at Augusta in 2014-2018 was absurdly good - that wasn't coincidence, he'd figured out the speed and slopes in a way most players haven't.
First-time Augusta participants get overpriced constantly. The market sees they're in good form and playing well, but Augusta's green speed is unlike anything else in golf. Even great putters struggle their first time because the adjustment is severe. I'd rather back someone who finished T25 at Augusta last year than the hot player making their debut, assuming form is remotely similar.
Weather matters more at Augusta than anywhere else because the greens are already at the edge of playable. If it's windy and dry, they get even faster and the tournament becomes pure survival. If there's rain, they slow down slightly and suddenly birdies are gettable. Strategy changes completely based on conditions.
How to Actually Use This
Check what speed the greens are expected to run. Tournament previews usually mention this, or you can check past years at the same venue. If it's a major or known fast-green venue, it matters. If it's a regular tour stop, probably doesn't unless the course is specifically known for quick greens.Look up putting stats on fast greens specifically, not overall putting stats. DataGolf has splits for green speed. Players who perform well on 12+ stimp are who you want when betting tournaments with fast conditions.
Check three-putt avoidance and lag putting from 25+ feet. These stats correlate more with scoring on fast greens than overall make percentage. Someone who's elite from 5-10 feet but mediocre at lag putting will struggle when greens are running 13.
Factor in experience at that venue if it's Augusta or a US Open course they've played before. Fast greens get easier with experience because you learn the subtle slopes and how putts break at speed. First-timers are always at a disadvantage.
Don't overthink it for regular tour stops. If the tournament isn't specifically known for fast greens, this whole analysis probably doesn't matter. Focus on form and course fit instead.
What This Looks Like in Practice
You're betting the US Open. Greens are forecasted to run 14+ with typical brutal hole locations. You've narrowed it down to two players at similar odds - both are in good form, both have games that suit difficult setups. One ranks 15th in strokes gained putting on fast greens this year. The other ranks 60th but has better overall putting stats because he crushes it on slower greens.The green speed split tells you who to back. The guy who ranks 60th overall but is actually good on fast greens is probably underpriced because the market is looking at overall putting numbers. The guy who ranks 15th overall but struggles on fast greens is probably overpriced for the same reason.
Or you're betting Augusta and there's a European player making his debut. He's playing great golf, his ball-striking is elite, his putting stats look solid. But he's never putted on greens running 13.5 with Augusta's slopes. Compare him to a player who's been there three times and consistently avoided three-putts. Even if the veteran's recent form is slightly worse, the experience edge on those greens might be worth more.
Not sure this is making as much sense as it should. The basic idea is green speed matters when it's extreme - either much faster or much slower than normal tour conditions. And when it matters, you need to check performance specifically on those surfaces, not just overall stats.
Common Questions People Ask
Someone will say "but Player X has great touch, surely they can adjust to any green speed." Maybe. But the stats usually show that even great putters have preferences. Some handle fast greens better, some handle slow greens better. Touch is relative - what feels perfect on one surface doesn't always translate.Or they'll point out a player who putted badly at Augusta one year but it was clearly a one-off bad week. That happens. You're looking for patterns over multiple attempts, not single results. One bad putting week doesn't mean someone can't handle fast greens if they've been fine there other times.
The question about whether green speed or green firmness matters more comes up too. They're related but different. Firmness affects how approach shots react - whether they hold greens or release. Speed affects putting. Both matter but in different ways. A course can have firm fast greens or firm slow greens depending on moisture and grass type.
FAQ
What stimp reading is considered "fast" for PGA Tour purposes?Anything above 12 is legitimately fast. Regular tour stops run 10-11. Major championships and difficult setups push 12.5-14. Above 13.5 is extreme - you basically only see this at Augusta and some US Open setups. The difference between 11 and 13 is massive in terms of putting difficulty even though the numbers don't look far apart.
Do fast greens favor certain putting styles?
Shorter strokes with less moving parts tend to handle fast greens better. Long flowing strokes are harder to control when you need minimal pace. Arc vs straight-back putting probably matters less than stroke length and tempo. Players who accelerate through the ball rather than decelerating handle fast greens better because deceleration creates inconsistent pace.
Should I fade players who haven't experienced fast greens before?
At majors with extreme green speeds, yeah probably. First-time Augusta participants without fast-green experience are usually bad bets unless their price is so long that the risk is worth it. But at regular tour stops where greens are just slightly faster than average, experience matters less. Anyone on tour can handle 11.5 stimp, it's the 13+ surfaces where inexperience shows.
Last edited: