- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,643
- Reaction score
- 184
- Points
- 63
This article is for DFS bettors who need to understand how game script, pace, and efficiency correlations work, which stacks to target in NFL and NBA, and how to identify soft correlations that bypass platform filters.
Why DFS Platforms Struggle With Correlation
Traditional sportsbooks price Same Game Parlays (SGPs) using algorithms that account for correlation. If you try to parlay Mahomes passing yards Over with Travis Kelce receiving yards Over, the sportsbook reduces the payout because these outcomes are positively correlated - when Mahomes throws a lot, Kelce is likely getting targets.A fair payout for two independent 50% probability events would be +300 (4x your stake). But a correlated SGP might pay +180 instead because the actual combined probability is higher than if the events were independent.
DFS Pick'em platforms can't do this. Their entire business model is fixed multipliers. Pick 2 props, get 3x. Pick 5 props, get 20x. The payout doesn't change based on which specific props you select.
To protect themselves, platforms block obvious correlations. You can't pair Mahomes passing yards with Kelce receiving yards in the same entry. You can't pair LeBron James points with Anthony Davis points in a Lakers game. The software recognizes these as same-game, same-team correlations and rejects the entry.
But this filtering is imperfect. It catches obvious correlations (same offensive unit, direct statistical relationship) but misses soft correlations (game script relationships, pace relationships, opponent-based relationships). That's where the edge exists.
The Three Types of Exploitable Correlation
Not all correlations are created equal. Some are obvious and blocked. Some are subtle and slip through filters. Understanding which type you're targeting matters.Obvious Correlations (Blocked by Platforms)
- Same player, multiple props (Mahomes passing yards + Mahomes touchdowns)
- Direct teammates (QB passing yards + his WR receiving yards)
- Same game totals (Team total points + opponent team total points Over)
These won't work. The software catches them. Don't waste time trying to stack them.
Soft Correlations (Often Bypass Filters)
- Game script relationships (team winning = running back carries, team losing = QB pass attempts)
- Opponent-focused correlations (one team's defensive weakness creates opportunity for opponent's strength)
- Pace-based correlations (high-pace games help multiple players across both teams)
These are what you're hunting. They're correlated in reality but not blocked by the software because they involve different teams, different positions, or indirect relationships.
Negative Correlations (Advanced)
- Teammate competition (one WR's targets come at expense of another WR)
- Possession-based inverse (one team dominates time of possession, opponent gets fewer plays)
These are harder to exploit but they exist. If you're taking Under on one player, you might take Over on a teammate whose production increases when the first player is less involved.
Game Script Stacks in NFL
Game script is the narrative flow of a football game. Is it a blowout? Is it close? Who's winning? Game script determines play-calling, which determines statistical output.The Classic Game Script Stack
Scenario: Chiefs are 10-point favorites over the Panthers. You expect the Chiefs to build a lead and protect it in the second half.
Correlated stack:
- Panthers QB (Bryce Young) passing attempts OVER
- Panthers RB rushing attempts UNDER
- Chiefs RB rushing attempts OVER
The logic: Chiefs build a lead early. Second half, they run the ball to kill clock. Panthers are trailing, forced to throw to catch up. The RB gets game-scripted out. The QB throws 40+ times in desperation.
These three props are correlated by a single narrative but they span different teams and positions. Most DFS platforms won't block this entry. The fixed 5-pick payout treats them as independent when they're actually betting on the same outcome: Chiefs lead comfortably.
The Blowout Special
Scenario: Bills are massive favorites over a weak opponent. You expect a 30+ point blowout where starters rest in the fourth quarter.
Correlated stack:
- Josh Allen passing touchdowns UNDER (he sits after three quarters)
- Bills backup RB rushing attempts OVER (James Cook rests, backup gets garbage time carries)
- Opponent QB passing yards OVER (trailing badly, throwing constantly)
This stack bets on blowout game script from multiple angles. The favorite's stars play limited snaps. The backups get work. The losing team throws all fourth quarter trying to make it respectable.
The Defensive Mismatch Stack
Scenario: A team with elite pass defense faces a team with weak pass offense. You expect the QB to struggle but the RB to handle heavy volume as the only viable offensive option.
Correlated stack:
- QB passing yards UNDER
- Team's RB rushing attempts OVER
- Opponent's defensive backs tackle totals OVER (they're making tackles on short completions and run stuffs)
This is betting on offensive limitation creating predictable play distribution. The QB can't attack downfield, so the offense leans on the run game. The defense stacks the box, tackles pile up.
Pace Stacks in NBA
NBA pace is possessions per game. High-pace games create more opportunities for everyone. Points, assists, rebounds - all of them benefit from more possessions. Low-pace games suppress everything.The High-Pace Game Stack
Scenario: Two up-tempo teams (Pacers vs Kings, both top-5 in pace) playing with playoff implications. You expect a fast-paced shootout exceeding 240 total points.
Correlated stack:
- Pacers star (Tyrese Haliburton) points OVER
- Pacers secondary scorer (Myles Turner) points OVER
- Kings star (De'Aaron Fox) assists OVER
- Kings secondary scorer (Domantas Sabonis) rebounds OVER
All four props benefit from the same underlying condition: high pace. More possessions means more opportunities for points, more fast breaks (assists), more missed shots (rebounds). You're not betting on individual performance. You're betting on game structure creating statistical inflation.
The platform prices these as four independent events. In reality, they're correlated through pace. If the game hits 250 total points with 110+ possessions, all four props are likely to hit together.
The Injured Star Stack
Scenario: Lakers playing without LeBron. Anthony Davis and Austin Reaves need to absorb the usage.
Correlated stack:
- Anthony Davis points OVER
- Anthony Davis rebounds OVER
- Austin Reaves assists OVER
- Opponent's defensive matchup (whoever guards Davis) fouls OVER
When a star sits, his teammates' usage spikes. Davis isn't just getting more shot attempts. He's getting more touches, more screens, more attention. That creates fouls on his defender. Reaves becomes the primary ball-handler, driving assist opportunities.
This stack bets on usage redistribution from a single injury creating multiple statistical beneficiaries. The platform prices them independently. You're pricing them as correlated through necessity.
The Rest/Load Management Stack
Scenario: A team on the second night of a back-to-back, third game in four nights, with stars listed as "questionable" who might play limited minutes even if active.
Correlated stack:
- Star player minutes UNDER (load managed, sits fourth quarter if game is decided)
- Backup player minutes OVER (fills the rotation gap)
- Star player points UNDER (fewer minutes = fewer points)
- Backup player points OVER (more minutes = more opportunity)
This is betting on rotation management creating inverse outcomes. The star plays 28 minutes instead of 36. The backup plays 24 minutes instead of 15. Their statistical outputs adjust accordingly.
The Inefficiency Stack in NFL
This is the most advanced correlation type. You're betting on statistical inefficiency - a team that generates yards without scoring touchdowns, or scores touchdowns without accumulating yards.The Red Zone Rusher Stack
Scenario: Eagles offense. Jalen Hurts is a rushing threat inside the 5-yard line. The team gets into the red zone consistently but Hurts vultures touchdowns from the running backs.
Correlated stack:
- Jalen Hurts passing yards OVER (he moves the ball through the air between the 20s)
- Jalen Hurts rushing touchdowns OVER (he scores in the red zone)
- Miles Sanders rushing touchdowns UNDER (Hurts takes his goal-line carries)
You're betting on offensive efficiency segmented by field position. Hurts throws to move down the field. He runs to finish drives. Sanders does the work between the 20s but doesn't score.
This bypasses platform filters because you're not pairing Hurts' passing and rushing stats directly. You're pairing his passing with his rushing touchdowns specifically, which many platforms allow. And you're adding an opponent RB under, which further obscures the correlation from automated detection.
The Garbage Time Quarterback Stack
Scenario: A QB on a bad team that's often trailing. They throw a lot in garbage time, accumulating yards without touchdowns because defenses play soft coverage protecting the lead.
Correlated stack:
- QB passing yards OVER
- QB passing touchdowns UNDER
- QB's primary receiver receiving yards OVER
- Team total points UNDER
You're betting on offensive volume without efficiency. Lots of yards, few points. The QB throws 50 times for 350 yards but only 1 touchdown because they're getting yards when the game is already decided.
The Bend-Don't-Break Defense Stack
Scenario: A defense that allows yardage but tightens in the red zone. Opponents move the ball but settle for field goals.
Correlated stack:
- Opponent QB passing yards OVER
- Opponent team total points UNDER
- Defensive player tackles/assists OVER (making tackles between the 20s)
This bets on defensive strategy. The defense allows underneath completions and short gains (yards, tackles) but prevents explosive plays and red zone touchdowns (points).
How to Identify Soft Correlations Yourself
You don't need to memorize every possible stack. You need a framework for identifying correlations that platforms won't catch.Ask: What Single Outcome Would Make Multiple Props Hit?
If you can describe a single game narrative where three or four props all hit together, those props are likely correlated.
"Chiefs blow out Panthers early" = Chiefs RB carries Over + Panthers QB attempts Over + Panthers RB carries Under. One narrative, three correlated props.
Look for Inverse Relationships Within Same Team
When one player's production increases, whose decreases? That's negative correlation. If a WR1 sits with injury, the WR2's targets spike. You take WR1 Under (he's out) and WR2 Over (he absorbs usage).
Check Pace and Game Environment Factors
High pace helps everyone. Indoor games (higher scoring) help offensive props. Weather (wind, rain) helps unders. These are environmental correlations that affect multiple props simultaneously.
Exploit Obvious Game Script When Vegas Agrees
If a team is favored by 14 points, Vegas is telling you blowout is likely. Build stacks around that expected script. Favorite's RB carries Over (clock management), underdog's QB attempts Over (playing from behind).
Why Platforms Can't Fully Stop This
You might wonder: if correlation stacking is known, why don't platforms just block everything?They can't without destroying their product. If they blocked every possible correlated combination, users couldn't build entries. You couldn't pair any two NFL players from the same game. You couldn't pair any two NBA players if their teams are playing each other.
The user experience would collapse. People want to build entries around games they're watching. Blocking all same-game props is commercially unviable.
So platforms compromise. They block obvious same-team, same-unit correlations (QB + his WR) but allow cross-team and position-diverse correlations (QB + opponent RB) because those appear independent even though they're not.
This creates exploitable gaps. The correlation exists. The payout treats it as independent. You extract value.
The Risk: Correlation Can Work Against You
Correlation isn't always your friend. If you stack props that are positively correlated and one leg fails, the others are more likely to fail too. Your entire entry can bust on a single unexpected game script.Example: You stack Chiefs blowout props. Chiefs go up 21-0 in the first quarter, everything looks perfect. Then Patrick Mahomes gets injured. Andy Reid plays conservative. The second half is run-heavy and slow. Panthers never mount a comeback.
Your Panthers QB attempts Over misses (they gave up, stopped throwing). Your Chiefs RB carries Over misses (backups split carries). Multiple legs of your correlation stack fail because the initial premise (sustained Chiefs dominance) changed mid-game.
This is why correlation stacking isn't free money. It's an edge, not a guarantee. You're increasing your probability of hitting when the correlation plays out, but you're also increasing your bust rate when it doesn't.
The math still favors you over time if you're identifying genuine correlations that the platform underprices. But individual entries will fail more dramatically than if you were picking truly independent props.
Platform-Specific Rules You Need to Know
Different DFS platforms have different correlation filters. What works on PrizePicks might get blocked on Underdog.PrizePicks
Generally blocks same-player multi-prop entries, same-team direct correlations (QB + his WR), and obvious SGP-style combinations. More permissive on cross-team stacks and position-diverse combinations.
Underdog Fantasy
Similar filtering to PrizePicks but slightly more aggressive. Sometimes blocks stacks that PrizePicks allows. More likely to reject entries with three or more props from the same game even if different teams.
Sleeper
Less sophisticated filtering. Often allows stacks that other platforms block. Smaller user base means less sharp money, but also lower limits.
You need to test which stacks each platform accepts. Build the entry and see if it processes. If it gets rejected, adjust by removing one leg or substituting a different prop.
Practical Stack Examples for Week 1 NFL
Here are three ready-to-use correlation stacks for typical NFL scenarios. Adapt the specific players to your week's slate.Stack 1: Heavy Favorite Blowout
- Favorite's QB passing attempts UNDER (game script allows him to sit fourth quarter)
- Favorite's RB rushing attempts OVER (clock management mode)
- Underdog's QB passing attempts OVER (trailing, throwing in desperation)
- Underdog's RB rushing attempts UNDER (abandoned in game script)
- Underdog's primary WR receiving yards OVER (garbage time volume)
This is a 5-pick flex entry betting on sustained blowout script. Works best when spread is 10+ points.
Stack 2: Defensive Slugfest
- Both QBs passing yards UNDER (defenses dominating)
- Both teams total points UNDER (low-scoring game)
- Both teams' leading tackler tackles OVER (defense on field more, making plays)
This is a 5-pick betting on defensive game that stays low-scoring. Works best when total is under 42.
Stack 3: Offensive Shootout
- Both QBs passing yards OVER
- Both primary WRs receiving yards OVER
- Game total points OVER
Straightforward high-scoring game stack. Less correlated than game script stacks but simpler to execute. Works when two high-powered offenses meet.
Practical Stack Examples for NBA
Stack 1: Pace Explosion- Team A star points OVER
- Team A secondary scorer assists OVER
- Team B star points OVER
- Team B secondary scorer rebounds OVER
- Game total points OVER
Pure pace stack. Works when two top-10 pace teams play each other. You're betting on 240+ total points creating statistical inflation across both teams.
Stack 2: Star Sits, Usage Shifts
- Injured star minutes UNDER (or don't include him if ruled out)
- Teammate 1 points OVER
- Teammate 2 assists OVER
- Teammate 3 rebounds OVER
Betting on usage redistribution when a 30% usage player sits. His touches go somewhere. You're identifying who absorbs them.
Stack 3: Back-to-Back Fatigue
- Team on back-to-back: star player points UNDER (tired legs, fewer minutes)
- Opponent (rested): star player points OVER (exploiting tired defense)
- Team on back-to-back: bench player minutes OVER (starters getting rest)
Betting on rest advantage. Rested team plays harder. Tired team manages minutes.
How to Track Your Correlation Stack Success
Don't just build stacks blindly. Track which types work and which don't.Keep a spreadsheet:
- Stack type (game script, pace, inefficiency)
- Props included
- Win/loss
- Why it hit or missed
After 20-30 entries, patterns emerge. Maybe your game script stacks hit 60% but your pace stacks only hit 48%. That tells you where your edge actually is versus where you think it is.
Correlation stacking isn't magic. It's probability manipulation. You're increasing your combined hit rate from 54.9% (if props were independent) to maybe 58-60% (because they're correlated). That 3-5% improvement compounds over volume.
But you need to verify it's actually working. Track results. Adjust. Iterate.
FAQ
Can I stack five correlated props in one entry?Yes, but be careful. The more props you stack around a single correlation, the more dramatic your busts when that correlation fails. Diversify at least one or two legs to reduce variance. Mix two correlated stacks (game script + pace) rather than going all-in on one narrative.
Do platforms adjust payouts when they detect correlation?
No. They can't because they use fixed multipliers. They either block the entry entirely or they accept it at standard payout. If your entry processes, you're getting the same 20x payout regardless of whether your props are correlated or independent.
What's the hit rate difference between correlated and independent props?
Hard to quantify exactly, but estimate 3-5% improvement in combined probability when using genuine soft correlations. If independent props would give you 54% combined probability of hitting, correlated props might give you 57-59%. That's massive over large sample size.
